The Ridiculous LG(Jung) and The winning Kejari

Fundamentally, this is a ridiculous stand-off. The people of Delhi have chosen Kejriwal to run the Delhi government, not the LG. Jung should respect the mandate of the people, the spirit of democracy and let Kejriwal take independent decisions and face their consequences. The LG should gracefully revert to being what he is—a ceremonial head—and let Kejriwal run the show.

Can we even imagine the absurdity of Prime Minister Narendra Modi fighting with the President over the appointment of his finance secretary or some other bureaucrat?

----------------------------------------------------------------

The BJP and its puppets have given a fresh lease of life to Arvind Kejriwal. They have revived the legend of the Chief Minister nobody wants to succeed; the battle over bureaucratic appointments has once again generated a wave of sympathy for Kejriwal, washing away some of his recent political sins.

The democratically-elected CM of a Delhi is fighting for the right to choose his own team. Like all other CMs in the country, Kejriwal too wants the power to decide which bureaucrat is best suited for a job. But the lieutenant governor (LG) of Delhi has put his foot down. The man who works as a proxy for the Centre, wants to thrust his own decisions on the CM. He wants Kejriwal to work with a team selected by the LG’s office. After unilaterally appointing the chief secretary, LG Najeeb Jung has now quashed all bureaucratic appointments by the Kejriwal government in the past week, saying only the LG has the power to appoint and transfer, from IAS officers to stenos.

Fundamentally, this is a ridiculous stand-off. The people of Delhi have chosen Kejriwal to run the Delhi government, not the LG. Jung should respect the mandate of the people, the spirit of democracy and let Kejriwal take independent decisions and face their consequences. The LG should gracefully revert to being what he is—a ceremonial head—and let Kejriwal run the show.

File photo. Reuters

The idea of a neutered CM in a democracy is absurd. What is the point of having a democratically-elected CM if he can’t even handpick his own steno and his decisions can be trashed by somebody who claims extraordinary powers but no responsibility? Can we even imagine the absurdity of Prime Minister Narendra Modi fighting with the President over the appointment of his finance secretary or some other bureaucrat?

There is no history of such an ugly stand-off between the Delhi CM and the LG over the appointment of bureaucrats. There is not a shred of evidence to believe that the LG was equally proactive during the tenures of Madan Lal Khurana, Sahab Singh Verma, Sushma Swaraj and Sheila Dikshit; that similar attempts were made to remote-control Kejriwal’s predecessors. Obviously, Jung is the pioneer of this new war.

Kejriwal’s critics believe they have a case against him. They have various arguments justifying Jung’s activism: The Delhi LG has extra-ordinary powers and Kejriwal is just a quasi CM. He is a mayor masquerading as the head of an assembly that should have ideally been called a municipality. He has no business questioning the LG’s interference and should humbly accept whatever administrative decisions are thrown at him. These are the terms and conditions of the Delhi CM’s job; he should not whine about them and accept his limitations gracefully...

Fair enough. The Indian Express has pointed out that the LG has a wide-range of powers; some of them are not clearly defined and thus leave ample scope for ambiguity. Yet, in this particular instance, he seems to be deviating from the rulebook.

‘Rule 45, which deals with the LG’s “Executive Functions”, allows the LG to exercise his powers in matters connected to ‘public order’, ‘police’ and ‘land’ “in consultation with the Chief Minister, if it is so provided under any order issued by the President under Article 239 of the Constitution”.

Another clause, related to when an issue can be referred to the central government, says that in case of a difference of opinion between the LG and a Minister, the LG must first try to settle the issue through “discussion”. In case the difference of opinion persists, the LG can “direct that the matter be referred to the Council of Ministers”. If, however, there is difference of opinion between the LG and the Council of Ministers, the LG must refer it to the central government for “the decision of the President”, and is bound to abide by it.”

Under Clause 55 (2), subject to instructions issued by the central government, the LG is bound to make a “prior reference” to the Centre with regard to proposals for the “appointment of Chief Secretary and Commissioner of Police, Secretary (Home) and Secretary (Lands)”.’

So far, there is no evidence Jung followed the procedure laid down in the rule book. And lawyers like Indira Jaising and Rajiv Dhavan are justified in slamming Jung for creating this crisis. “This crisis has been created entirely by the Lt-Governor. It is abundantly clear that the Lt-Governor has exceeded his authority and has turned the entire relationship between himself and the Council of Ministers on its head to jeopardise democracy and the Constitution,” Dhavan wrote when his opinion was sought by the Delhi government.

It is apparent Kejriwal is being singled out for treatment as a rubber stamp’s puppet to ensure that his government doesn’t settle down and he becomes synonymous with anarchy, fights and ego tussles. The political price of letting Kejriwal succeed is huge and after the thrashing in Delhi, both the Congress and the BJP want Kejriwal to trip and run away, this time never to return.

But, Kejriwal isn’t repeating his bhagora act. He has the support of 66 MLAs and his government, unless something dramatic happens, is not going to fall in 149 days. By trying to paralyse his government, his detractors are turning him into a martyr, a victim of political conspiracies and giving him valid reasons to blame the Centre for raising roadblocks.

Kejriwal is best when he is a bechara, a subject of public sympathy. This silly jung (fight) will only add to his image of a crusader against the system. There will be just one winner of this Kejri-war.

Salman Khan NO Saint

many of these under trials have spent more time in jail than the sentence they would have got had they been convicted for the crime they were arrested for, which is against the law of the land. 

“fact of the matter is so true, the politicians and judges have created a shield around them and no one can challenge so that they can do corruption freely and put into jail anyone who challenges them ... price for democracy that common man has to pay....”

After a long 13 years of trail, finally Salman was declared guilty and punished......Alas!!!! Got a bail from High court in 3 hours!!!!

Is the same privilege available for a common man????  Answer is NO.

As per a statistics, almost over 2.5 lakh under trials are languishing in jails across the country. As a matter of fact Indian judiciary system is NOT as proactive in case of a common prisoner or the poor.

According to the government's own calculation, many of these under trials have spent more time in jail than the sentence they would have got had they been convicted for the crime they were arrested for, which is against the law of the land.

Some of these under trials are petty thieves and rag pickers and can't afford bail bond for which they continue to languish in prison. In many cases, under trials have been jailed for more than a decade without their cases being listed for trial. There is no comprehensive central data bank yet on the number of under trials, the number of years they have been behind bars and nature of their crime

Fact of SALMAN KHAN (He has even SLAPPED his FEMALE friends in Public)

Did SALMAN do any charity before the 2002 incident? He has been best known for is egomaniac, grouchy and quarrelsome personality. He has been often in NEWS for all bad reasons, for example, indulge in Fight in a party, Slapping his female friends and co-starts in public. 

This entire Being Human even his adopted sister marriage with such a huge Hype and Fan Fare (Please note that for his real sister marriage there was no news and NO Hype. So why this time!!!)  It gives the impression that he did charity only to use it as an excuse in court to evade justice. Even if he has genuinely helped people he still has to face justice because good karma does not cancel out bad karma. He will get his rewards for his good karma but also has to suffer for his bad karma.
What did he gain by trying to evade justice for so long? He lived for 13 years with fear of law and now has to serve 5 years in jail. If Salman had been wise and honest, he would have confessed to his crime immediately and got away with a minimum sentence, finished his jail term long ago and could have been living happily now. People may have accepted that he had turned over a new leaf and was a decent man now. But he dragged the case for 13 years and his reputation is tarnished.
Most Bollywood celebs support him because he has power and influence and they are afraid that he will ruin their careers if they speak against him

BEING HUMAN (More of a lifestyle brand than a charity organization)

BEING HUMAN, as a matter of fact was a PR activity to improvise Salman’s image. I have seen more outlets of it having a premium price tag, and never seen his camp or volunteer working for some cause.

I am unwilling to write but can’t hold my temptation to write that “fact of the matter is so true, the politicians and judges have created a shield around them and no one can challenge so that they can do corruption freely and put into jail anyone who challenges them ... price for democracy that common man has to pay....”

आराम करो आराम करो

आराम शब्द में ‘राम’ छिपा जो भव-बंधन को खोता है।
आराम शब्द का ज्ञाता तो विरला ही योगी होता है।
इसलिए तुम्हें समझाता हूँ, मेरे अनुभव से काम करो।

ये जीवन, यौवन क्षणभंगुर, आराम करो, आराम करो।
यदि करना ही कुछ पड़ जाए तो अधिक न तुम उत्पात करो।

अपने घर में बैठे-बैठे बस लंबी-लंबी बात करो।
करने-धरने में क्या रक्खा जो रक्खा बात बनाने में।
जो ओठ हिलाने में रस है, वह कभी न हाथ हिलाने में।
धंधा पानी सब छोड़ छाड़ , आराम रस रसपान करो

ये जीवन, यौवन क्षणभंगुर, आराम करो, आराम करो।
यदि करना ही कुछ पड़ जाए तो अधिक न तुम उत्पात करो।

मैं यही सोचकर पास अक्ल के, कम ही जाया करता हूँ।
जो बुद्धिमान जन होते हैं, उनसे कतराया करता हूँ।
दीए जलने के पहले ही घर में आ जाया करता हूँ।
जो मिलता है, खा लेता हूँ, चुपके सो जाया करता हूँ।
मेरी गीता में लिखा हुआ — सच्चे योगी जो होते हैं,
वे कम-से-कम बारह घंटे तो बेफ़िक्री से सोते हैं।
तुम भटको ना ऐ भोले पथिक थोड़ी देर विश्राम करो

ये जीवन, यौवन क्षणभंगुर, आराम करो, आराम करो।
यदि करना ही कुछ पड़ जाए तो अधिक न तुम उत्पात करो।

Being a Humanist..not communalist

In India, still a majority of proportion is busy in earning his/her bread and butter.

They hardly have any time to think, as which religion they belong to.

--- -- --- -- --- --

One thorn of experience is worth a whole wilderness of warning.

By James Russell Lowell

It’ has been in my notice that these days on Facebook, there have an exponential increase of certain activities which create an atmosphere of hatred and antagonism.

If any particular religion has got some defect or their disciples are misled, can hatred for them, help to make the situation any better?

Should we make India as Pakistan?  As a matter of fact Pakistan is a classical example, as how a country whose philosophy and policies are religion centric with a blend of antagonism and disregard for other religion, can never peruse as a nation and eventually become a hub of terrorist and unsocial element.

Our social fabric is woven with different religion. Here we have a space and respect for every religion.

If one’s approach is religiously uncompromised or extreme, one is dealing with the odds associated to it, oneself.

We are seeing the war waged among the different sects of same religion in the other part of the globe where religious sentiment is a dominating and deciding factor.

There is a massacre, mayhem and migration which accounts for extensive proportion of their population where such stiff religious mentality is in existence and practice.

If we too become extremist, inhuman and barbaric towards other religion, maybe we will succeed in eradicating them or suppressing them but as a human we will be left with cruelty and inhumanity within ourselves, which eventually, will harm us.

It’s same as we use pesticides in our fields in order to get rid of fungus from our crop, though we succeed in eliminating them but we left with our poisonous crop which eventually harms our immune.

I feel proud on the religion I belong to. It  is tolerant, unbigoted and liberal by its basic philosophy.  It does not put any restriction or condition to its disciple as how to perform puja, whom to offer prayers. Where almost every creature exists in this nature, are worshiped in some or other form and format.

We don’t follow or at least we are not bound to follow any FATWA issue by any priest. We are free to use our intellect and deliver our opinion about our God in public with no fear of getting beheaded.

Should we downgrade our living to a level where our entire thought process confined to show our religious narrowness? Should be leave past our strong culture of being a savior, a guide and led blindfolded.

As a matter of fact the condition is not as bad as it’s been told and explained by some extremist group.

In India, still a majority of proportion is busy in earning their bread and butter.They hardly have any time to think, as which religion they belong to.

It’s some hate monger or people with their own vested interest, trying to propagate such feeling among the society and create a chaos. It’s purely for their personal gain.

This is high time, when one has to be very careful and attentive. Use your own intellect and pause for some time and think before you press SHARE button on any such post or tweets which create division among people.

With this thought, I leave this page for you to think further.

दिल के रिश्ते हो मुक्कमल रहे न यहाँ मलाल कोई 

मोह्हबत से हम करे फ़तेह दिल 

जंग हो नाउम्मीद , न हो धरती लाल कोई 

सोच माँ आंसुओ को, जिनको न है इल्म कोई 

उसका अंचल है उजाड़ता 

फ़ना चाहे जो हुआ

हिन्दू या मुलसमान कोई। … By अभिषेक 

AAP ENIGMA

Input from: THE HINDU
The Arvind Kejriwal-led Aam Aadmi Party rose like a meteor, but hasn’t crashed like one — at least not yet. Nonetheless, the euphoria that accompanied the AAP’s December 2013 electoral debut in Delhi, likened to the Arab Spring by some, has dulled, leaving the party tackling difficult questions around its past and future strategy. Right through the general election campaign, Mr. Kejriwal was chased by the accusation that he had irresponsibly abandoned governance in Delhi after only 49 days. However, barely had Mr. Kejriwal apologised to Delhi voters for the error of judgment, when he was taken into custody in a defamation case filed by the Bharatiya Janata Party leader, Nitin Gadkari. The AAP’s response to the defamation case has been as expected, with Mr. Kejriwal preferring detention to furnishing a bail bond and the cadres reverting to protest mode. From the AAP’s perspective, it is no doubt a travesty of justice that its “honest leader” has been jailed while the “corrupt” continue to escape punishment. Yet, moral indignation as a repeated tool can be fatigue-inducing. The AAP captured the public imagination with its energetic anti-corruption crusade only to abdicate when placed in power. Today, its principal challenge is to overcome its “forever-fighter” image and prove that it has the steel required to stay in and discharge responsibility.

For all this, though, it would be a mistake to write off the AAP, which fought a valiant battle in the general election, capturing four seats — all in Punjab — for a two per cent share of the national vote. In Varanasi, Mr. Kejriwal took on the might of the Narendra Modi campaign machine with no resources save the support of an army of well-wishers who descended on the temple city vowing to make it a contest worth remembering. Mr. Kejriwal expectedly lost to Mr. Modi, and by a good margin. However, his alternative narrative, built around corporate support to the Modi campaign, and the open flaunting of resources by the Bharatiya Janata Party, had its takers, as can be seen from the over two lakh votes Mr. Kejriwal polled against a prospective Prime Minister. The Muslim support Mr. Kejriwal drew has its own lessons to offer. Muslims flocked to Mr. Kejriwal, rejecting appeals by local don Mukhtar Ansari to accept himself as a candidate. This indicates at once the community’s yearning for clean and secular politics and its strong distrust of Mr. Modi. In the coming days, the AAP will have to ask itself if it erred in spreading itself thin over the whole country. The AAP also has its task cut out in proving to the country that it represents a certain idea that will continue to remain relevant — perhaps now more than ever.

Digvijay's New Relationship- Morally Crooked

Even in ISLAM, “polygamy is neither mandatory nor encouraged but merely permitted. The Koran’s conditional endorsement of polygamy stresses that self-interest or sexual desire should not be the reason for entering into a polygamous marriage” because the original purpose of allowing this practice was “to protect the social and financial standing of the widows and orphans in their community.

Marriage is the bonding of two minds which cannot be achieved simultaneously with more than one woman.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Digvijay Singh, at the age of 67, less than a year after the demise of his former wife, Mrs. Asha Singh , is in relationship again  with journalist Amrita Rai. To whom he is intended to get married.

This can be technically correct but what Mr. Digvijay Singh has done is clear and qualified case of polygamy. This has been done for purely for  his sensual gratification.

I really doubt, if he has ever loved his wife?!?!?!?!?!?

Even in ISLAM, “polygamy is neither mandatory nor encouraged but merely permitted. The Koran’s conditional endorsement of polygamy stresses that self-interest or sexual desire should not be the reason for entering into a polygamous marriage” because the original purpose of allowing this practice was “to protect the social and financial standing of the widows and orphans in their community.”

 In democratic India, it is time to clear certain misconceptions and misgivings regarding Law and Indian Tradition, especially for the people who represent or at least claims to be representative of common people, Merely because the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT stand codified and allow a second marriage after divorce or demise of previous wife, it does not in any manner entitle such people to get away with an interpretation which suits his convenience. Once again one should hit the nail on the head. One fails to understand why these politicians or influential people have always sought to straitjacket the time-transcending polysemic phraseology of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT and restrict its meaning to outdated medieval hermeneutics.

Marriage is the bonding of two minds which cannot be achieved simultaneously with more than one woman.

The sanctity of taking care of their children is further emphasized even when you are left alone afte demise of previous wife

Furthermore, the Indian tradition idyllically describes the marital couple as “spousal mates” created to find “quiet of mind” in the companionship of each other.

Digvijiya Singh has failed to uphold the sanctity of Indian Tradition. Technically may be he is correct but morally he is corrupt even here also (In addition to his politics)

Vote Someone or Something Down

Though in many countries democratic politics was started very early However, universal adult franchise -the principle of one person on vote was not fully realized. Even in America and Britain

In India, we have been blessed that post-independence democratic system was adopted and we all were given equal opportunity to vote with equal value.

A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends upon the character of the user.

Stop “vote early and vote often” practices

We should take an oath that:

we exercise our precious right mandated by the Constitution of India, of casting my vote, under every possible circumstance and whenever I get the opportunity. Election of our representative by voting is not only our right but also our duty towards the country.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

General Election 2014 is nearing. Holidays with NO “In Lieu of” are announced in offices……it’s may be a long weekend for many of us (Including Me)

I too could not resist the temptation of enjoying the long weekend with my family and friends.

BUT

Then I checked by my conscience “Am I doing the right thing?” and same goes to we all.

Should we really keep ourselves absent from General Election…”The Biggest Talent Show”(As on TV commercial rightly terms it).?

Well this question can have several answers with their own set of rationalizations.

As a part of our Constitutional Mandate, we have Right to vote.

Which means, no individual, authority, group of people or any institution can stop us to vote.

But it is also our FUNDAMENTAL DUTY to cast our vote. As this comes under Directive principles so it cannot be enforced by court of Law. And therefore technically, one can absent from voting at purely one’s wish with no legal obligation.

But this is not what ought to be exercised. Our Vote is our formal share to the political power.

If we don’t vote, we don’t have share in the power and therefore we are nobody to criticize the system, benefited from the system and Claim to the system

Let me enlighten the importance and validity of voting

The History of Electoral Vote to power is as old as it started in 6th century B.C.E. and here till present day.

The Electoral Voting was not very inclusive and transparent.

The story of modern democracy began at least two centuries ago. The popular uprising of French Revolution of 1789 did not establish a secure and stable democracy in France. Throughout the nineteenth century, democracy in France was overthrown and restored several times. Yet the French Revolution inspired many struggles for democracy all over Europe.

In Britain, the progress towards democracy started much before the French Revolution. But the progress was very slow. Through the eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries, series of political events reduced the power of monarchy and feudal lords. The right to vote was granted to more and more people. Around the same time as the French Revolution, the British colonies in North America declared themselves independent in 1776. In the next few years these colonies came together to form the United States of America.

Though in many countries democratic politics was started very early However, universal adult franchise -the principle of one person on vote was not fully realized

The Right to Vote was not extended to all people in many countries. It was limited to only few influential people or some sect.

Even after much of reform it was not allowed for women to cast their vote in many counties in Europe.

After much of gradual reform, it was extended to all.

A quick glance as when universal adult franchise granted to the country depicted in the table

1893	New Zealand
1917	Russia
1918	Germany
1919	Germany
1928	Britain
1931	Sri Lanka
1934	Turkey
1944	France
1945	Japan
1950	India
1951	Argentina
1952	Greece
1955	Malaysia
1962	Australia
1965	US
1978	SPAIN
1994	South Africa

In India, we have been blessed that post-independence democratic system was adopted and we all were given equal opportunity to vote with equal value.

Voting is our FUNDAMENTAL DUTY. Voting is the foundation stone of democracy. It’s very important to see what kind of election is being held. What kind of people can elect a government?

Today Democracy is the most prominent form of the government.

So a thoughtful voting will lead to a situation where a right party will be voted to power. 

A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends upon the character of the user.

Which  will further fulfill the wishes of the people by making different government policies which in favor of citizen of India and for our country as a whole.

We must not only vote but also create awareness among the people of our surroundings to vote.

We must go and meet with some poor and illiterate people around us and school them about importance of their vote. So that DRINK & VOTE should not happen. 

We must convince to exercise the power based on their own consciences and rational thought as to whom they should   vote to power.

Stop “vote early and vote often” practices.

Let’s not get influenced by any party just on their face value.

We must Pledge to vote.

We should take an oath that:

we exercise our precious right mandated by the Constitution of India, of casting our vote, under every possible circumstance and whenever we get the opportunity. Election of our representative by voting is not only our right but also our duty towards the country.

We  will make all possible efforts to use our vote to elect a public representative who would meet nation's expectations and,

we also take oath that we would also encourage other people to vote with awareness.

करना है भारत निर्माण

 शीश कटाते सैनिक देखे,

आंख दिखाता पाकिस्तान.

भाव गिराता रूपया देखा,

जान गंवाता हुआ किसान,

बहनों की इज्जत लुटती देखी,

काम खोजता नौजवान,

अन्न गोदामो में सड़ता देखा,

भूख से मरता हिंदुस्तान,

घोटालों की सत्ता देखी,

लुटता हुआ मेरा हिंदुस्तान.

कोई मुझको ये तो बता दे..

ये है कैसा भारत निर्माण....?????

देश की कश्ती

है फसी मझधार में

लूट का व्यापार छाया

वीर रस को छोड़

अब लोग है श्रृंगार में

रास्ते बदल गए

मजबूरियों की  आड़ में

हम बने बस हम बने

और लोग जाये भाड़ में

देश की देख हालत सांसत में फसी है जान

ये है कैसा भारत निर्माण....?????

माँ भारती की  धरती पे

आये कुछ दुःशासन  है...

माँ का  चीर हरन हो रहा

क्या  यही सुशासन  है!!

बेफिक्री और  बेपरवाही की नींद में

सो रहा है हर नौजवान

ये है कैसा भारत निर्माण....?????

बच्चे बिलख रहे भूख से

माँ की छाती भी सूखी है

ममता का भी कुछ मोल कहाँ

लोगो कि नज़रे भी भूखी हैं

माँ बहनो की  ममता का

हो रहा है अपमान

ये है कैसा भारत निर्माण....?????

शेष अभी संघर्ष बहुत है

समर शेष, कंटक बहुत हैं

सूरज धुंधला हो गया है

अंधकारमय है आसमान

ये है कैसा भारत निर्माण....?????

अब तो अलख जगाना होगा

राष्ट्रहित की बलिवेदी पर

अपना शीश कटाना होगा

तन मन धन सब अर्पण कर दो

बिकने ना पाये स्वाभिमान

करना है भारत निर्माण

करना है भारत निर्माण

एक स्मृति : एक श्रद्धांजलि (Someone Somewhere)

आज  हमने अपने जीवन का एक हिस्सा खोया है..
...
दुनिया  के इस झमेले में...
भाग दौड़ के  मेले में..
आपने हमेशा हमें सम्भाला ...
नित प्यार दिया ......नित प्यार से पाला  .
आज आपकी याद में आसमा भी रोया है..
आज  हमने अपने जीवन का एक हिस्सा खोया है..
..
जब भी हम घबराये.....था हाथ थामा आपने और कंधे थपथपाये .
ग़म के  बादल जब जब हम पे गहराए ...एक था सहारा आपका जो हम कभी न घबराये .
एक युग का सूरज अस्त हुआ ..पश्चिम छुप नभ में सोया है.
आज हमने अपने जीवन का एक हिस्सा खोया है..

था प्यार आपका अविरल, जो आज भी करे हमको बेकल
मेरे आँखों के निर्झर से आसु बहते  कल कल कल कल ..
उठती है हुक फिर यादो की ...दिल जार जार हो रोया है 
आज हमने अपने जीवन का एक हिस्सा खोया है..

हमने जो सिखा जो जाना ...
जबसे जाना .........आपको  जाना
संग हाथ पकड़ तुम्हारे चले..
कभी गिरे , उठे  कभी दौड़ पड़े..
जीवन के हर सच्चाई  में...मेरी  सफलताओ  की गहराई  में 
थे आप सदा मेरे साथ खड़े 
आपकी छाव में हम पले बढे ..
अरे ओ माली! इस फलते फूलते गुलशन का बीज आपने ही बोया है
आज हमने अपने जीवन का एक हिस्सा खोया है..

अपने जीवन के सफ़र में
शब  में और सहर  में
तुमने कितने मोड़ देखे
गीत और ग़म  के होड़ देखे
सुख  सबके साथ जिया 
ग़म  को तन्हा  पिया
कभी संगी साथ बैठे 
कभी, तन्हाई  में  सिमटे  
अलविदा कह दिया हमको खुद चल दिए सफ़र पे ...और हमको अश्को में भिगोया है 
आज हमने अपने जीवन का एक हिस्सा खोया है..

शेष है अभी यहाँ 
आपकी निशानियाँ
कुछ तो आपकी चीजे
कुछ आपकी कहानियाँ
ये कहानी हम तो क्या  वक़्त भी दुहरायेगा..
दूर चले गए भले पर
ये फ़ासला न रेह पायेगा 
हमारे मरासिम में है इतना असर के ,अब भी आपको दिलो में पिरोया है
आज हमने अपने जीवन का एक हिस्सा खोया है..

Duty and Country are the hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be

In the backdrop of recent political development, I hear our over joyed AAP has been turned over enthusiastic also. And planning to venture in to national politics by contesting General Election 2014.

In addition to that, AAP is going to contest on only 300 seats. Which means either they are over confident of 90 to 100%  success rate to be in power which is far above by any standard, even more than what they have got in DELHI, OR they are trying to spoil the General Election, which is not a game.

AAP is appearing very opportunistic ..which not good for either one. Neither for AAP nor for our country.

AAP should focus on the challenges which exist in Delhi, in terms of corruption, crisis and law and order.

And it should try to handle it with all sincerity and commitment .Now time has come they need to deliver. Days of big notions and promises are over. 

They owe to the people of DELHI and therefore they should oblige to them.

They need to prove the seriousness of their words which they have given to the People of Delhi.

At this time, being over enthusiastic and fight General Election 2014, will not only blemish  the political arithmetical equation, it may also  misbalance the entire political situation of country at national level, which by no means can be considered  a good situation.

If they(AAP)  fight GE2014, only congress will be the beneficiary. LALU is already out on Bail (Which I personally feel that has been granted to him by SWAYING JUDICIARY) to defect the voting pattern in BIHAR. 

MADHU KODA is already back in the Lap of congress.

AAP must understand the ground reality and complexity of IndIan politics.

Delhi is just a "CITY STATE" , so repeating the similar performance in the rest of the country is almost impossible with such a small span if time.

Indian Politics is a very complex, and demographic variations impact the voting pattern too. In this scenario , AAP may end up getting few seats which may be even in two digit.

As per today's scenario, in central, National politics as preferably called one should have bigger prospective to see.

Mr. Modi looks promising at National Politics he has the sense of commitment and delivery.

Mr. Modi may be viewd as a PRINCE by some section of society who believe he establish the RULE OF LAW, on the other hand for the rest, he may be viewed as a BEAST who establish RULE OF FORCE.

A ruler cannot always be soft . Some time he may have to use RULE OF FORCE to deal with certain circumstances. He may have to use his crafty skill to get rid of some problem

Even Chankya says

“Do not be very upright in your dealings for you would see by going to the forest that straight trees are cut down while crooked ones are left standing.” 

We may talk about different economic models, just to disapprove , Modi’s way of governance. But bottom line is, Gujarat scores much ahead in almost all parameters and indexes of development.

Modi cannot be criticized for a lack of virtue.

Country needs a decisive leader…Some time I miss INDIRA JEE for her excellent decisiveness and determination. Up to an extent Modi too looks similar.

Decisiveness is a characteristic of high performing individual.

Almost any decision is better than no decision at all. We as country have always lacked in our decision making process.

Due to which country has suffered a lot and so have we.

Country has witnessed the result of poor governance in last few years.

Suffering in India has more than doubled in recent years with one in every four Indian reported to be suffering because of nation’s poor economic performance in recent years, a consequence, which happened due to poor decision making.

There has been significant worsening in 'well-being’ of Indians and it is likely to be rooted in the country if this disappointing economic performance persists.

So onus lies upon the Citizens of India also to be sincere, submissive and attentive while casting your vote.

Don’t get lured by some attractive package. We need to see the larger picture. We need to see the country as a whole.

It is well to have this fact firmly fixed in our minds that our duty to our country is, of course, part of our duty to God.

We should not understand our country just a geographical Expansion, divided in to different provinces.

A country, in addition to provide just a shelter, it also provides the right to live a dignified life, right to choose your government, right to express your views, right to get your grievance addressed by appropriate authority and provides the Judiciary System which guarantees you to protect all your rights  ,  by its constitution itself.

So in turn we as a responsible citizen must reciprocate our duty to the nation.

I promise and pledge you to promise to do our best to serve our country