Thursday, May 1, 2014

Digvijay's New Relationship- Morally Crooked



Even in ISLAM, “polygamy is neither mandatory nor encouraged but merely permitted. The Koran’s conditional endorsement of polygamy stresses that self-interest or sexual desire should not be the reason for entering into a polygamous marriage” because the original purpose of allowing this practice was “to protect the social and financial standing of the widows and orphans in their community.

Marriage is the bonding of two minds which cannot be achieved simultaneously with more than one woman.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Digvijay Singh, at the age of 67, less than a year after the demise of his former wife, Mrs. Asha Singh , is in relationship again  with journalist Amrita Rai. To whom he is intended to get married.
This can be technically correct but what Mr. Digvijay Singh has done is clear and qualified case of polygamy. This has been done for purely for  his sensual gratification.

I really doubt, if he has ever loved his wife?!?!?!?!?!?

Even in ISLAM, “polygamy is neither mandatory nor encouraged but merely permitted. The Koran’s conditional endorsement of polygamy stresses that self-interest or sexual desire should not be the reason for entering into a polygamous marriage” because the original purpose of allowing this practice was “to protect the social and financial standing of the widows and orphans in their community.”

 In democratic India, it is time to clear certain misconceptions and misgivings regarding Law and Indian Tradition, especially for the people who represent or at least claims to be representative of common people, Merely because the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT stand codified and allow a second marriage after divorce or demise of previous wife, it does not in any manner entitle such people to get away with an interpretation which suits his convenience. Once again one should hit the nail on the head. One fails to understand why these politicians or influential people have always sought to straitjacket the time-transcending polysemic phraseology of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT and restrict its meaning to outdated medieval hermeneutics.

Marriage is the bonding of two minds which cannot be achieved simultaneously with more than one woman.
The sanctity of taking care of their children is further emphasized even when you are left alone afte demise of previous wife
Furthermore, the Indian tradition idyllically describes the marital couple as “spousal mates” created to find “quiet of mind” in the companionship of each other.

Digvijiya Singh has failed to uphold the sanctity of Indian Tradition. Technically may be he is correct but morally he is corrupt even here also (In addition to his politics)

No comments:

Post a Comment